Gerry, Wilkins e o RAPTOR de Madeleine McCann

[AnalistaZero]

1. O raptor, quando dentro do apartamento, ouvia distintamente as vozes de Gerry e Wilkins. Ele sabia, quando saiu do apartamento com a criança nos braços, que os dois homens se encontravam a conversar perto do apartamento, numa zona pouco movimentada e silenciosa.
Sabia que ao passar no topo sa rua, na direcção de um candeeiro de iluminação pública, fazendo barulho com os saltos dos sapatos, teria grandes possibilidades de ser visto por, pelo menos, um dos dois ingleses.
Ser-lhe-ia muito mais cómodo fazer o trajecto para poente, contornando a escola infantil, ou fazer o mesmo trajecto pelo outro passeio, junto ao muro, a maior distância do par, afastado do candeeiro e beneficiando do facto da menor inclinação da rua cortar a porção visível do seu corpo.
Então porque escolheu esse trajecto?
Simples: ostensivamente, ele queria mostar a um dos dois amigos (o verdadeiro mandante do crime), Gerry McCann ou Jeremy Wilkins, que fora bem sucedido.
Qualquer coisa como: - "Já aqui levo a criança, correu tudo bem!"
O raptor sabia que este estaria atento e que se colocaria de forma a ser ele apenas a presenciar a sua passagem.
Nenhum dos dois contou com o aparecimernto inesperado de Jane Tanner.


http://madeleinemaccann.blogspot.com/20 ... to_27.html

[Dust Devil]

Im sure this is all very interesting but could we have it in English please as I doubt there are many of us here that are fluent and can read this Portuguese statement?

[Michael Crane]

Im sure this is all very interesting but could we have it in English please as I doubt there are many of us here that are fluent and can read this Portuguese statement?

Babel Fish says:
. The abductor, when inside of the apartment, he distinct heard the voices of Gerry and Wilkins. It wise person, when she left the apartment with the child in the arms, that the two men if found to talk close to the apartment, in a moving and little quiet zone. Wise person who when passing in the top sa street, in the direcção of an oil lamp of public illumination, making racket with the jumps of the shoes, would have great possibilities of being seen by, at least, one of the two English. He would be to it cómodo not to make the passage for the west, skirting the infantile school, or to the same make passage for the other stroll, together to the wall, the biggest distance of the pair, moved away from the oil lamp and benefiting from the fact of the lesser inclination of the street to cut the visible portion of its body. Then because she chose this passage? Simple: ostensive, it wanted to mostar to one of the two friends (the true mandator of the crime), Gerry McCann or Jeremy Wilkins, who are successful. Any thing as: - "Already I take the child here, ran all good" The abductor wise person who this would be intent and that he would place himself of form to be it to only witness its ticket. None of the two counted on aparecimernto unexpected of Jane Tanner.

Clear as mud

[dennisg]

Was it written by Harry Enfield?