Portalegre Mortgage ruling

Share experience regarding ownership of property and/or living in Portugal.
Post Reply
shanagarry
CVO Legend
CVO Legend
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 7:26 pm
Location: Craigweil-on-Sea

Portalegre Mortgage ruling

Post by shanagarry »

Has anybody been following this case?

Having had a conversation with my lawyer earlier today on a totally unrelated matter she showed me a newspaper article (even though I couldn't read it) explaining the magnitude of the reported judgement handed down by the court and suggesting the serious ramifications of this case for Mortgagors who have financed property under Portuguese law.

For those that don't know - there has been a recent case in Portalegre, where Espirito Santo Bank pursued a borrower through the courts after he defaulted on his mortgage, for the outstanding interest on the loan (€46,356) - even though he had handed the property back. The court found in favour of the defaulter saying that handing back the property was sufficient for the bank to cover its costs - calling their action 'unjust enrichment'. The judgement is being reviewed by a number of government bodies with a view to passing it into law.

If this passes into law and a property is 'owned' by a borrower with little or no equity in the property who is struggling to service mortgage payments - there's likely to be a rush for the door in some quarters. I asked my bank manager what he made of it and he suggested that some banks will start to issue amended documents in the coming months to try and head off the possibility of an exodus. He wasn't very hopeful that many will be returned signed. Can you imagine the furore this will cause - if the tolls debacle is anything to go by.

How many expat mortgagees in The Algarve would relish the thought of this coming to pass :)
traveler
CVO Senior
CVO Senior
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:09 am

Re: Portalegre Mortgage ruling

Post by traveler »

I think the banks have been abusing mortgagees recently and the change to the law will ultimately be good for the consumer. I have heard the banks are completely incompetent when it comes to trying to workout loans. This change might also be better for the market, as banks will not be as interested in flooding the market with highly discounted properties (repossess a property, sell it at a discount to cover some of the mortgage and then pursue the mortgagee for the balance).
Post Reply